Today, numerous Bangladeshi women are taking charge of their
personal and professional lives. However, widespread gender bias and violence continue
to challenge their dreams of emancipation and empowerment. Have the two women Prime Ministers
of Bangladesh made a difference in the life of an average woman?
South Asian politics is dominated by
dynastic trends and the presence of women leaders at the helm of affairs. The former
is an unfortunate reality but the latter should be a source of pride for
developing nations that have traditionally struggled with gender issues to
provide their women with some very basic human rights. Whether it is the
assassinated former Prime Ministers Benazir Bhutto of Pakistan and Indira Gandhi
of India, or the still vibrant Khaleda Zia and Sheikh Hasina of Bangladesh, we
must credit these women for their determination and persistence against the
norms of their male-dominated cultures. Unfortunately, however, that is not a testament
to women’s empowerment because not only do most of these women leaders have a strong
male connection as primary reason for their rise to power, but also the life of
an average woman has remained largely unchanged under their rule.
Bangladesh is a developing nation of 165 million
with an adult literacy rate of about 55%. It has been run almost exclusively for
the past two decades by Bangladesh’s two Begums – current Prime Minister Sheikh
Hasina of Awami League (AL), and opposition leader and former Prime Minister
Khaleda Zia of Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP). Sheikh Hasina is the daughter of
Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, Bangladesh’s independence hero and first prime minister
murdered in 1975. Khaleda Zia is the widow of former president, Maj. Gen. Ziaur
Rahman assassinated in a failed coup attempt in 1981.
As Prime Ministers, the Begums have
been known to run corrupt regimes, and faced criminal charges. In 2007, the army tried to end their monopoly on power when it seized
power by splitting their vote banks and trying to create alternate forces.
However, the Begums’ parties proved resilient and Sheikh Hasina came back to
power in Dec 2008 and promptly resumed business as usual by filing more
corruption charges against her opponent.
It is safe to say the last two
decades have seen Bangladeshi women become more visible on
the social and professional scene, but the gains have fallen short of
expectation, especially under successive women Prime Minsters. So while the Begums focus on each
other, the majority of women fight their own battles at home and in the social
sphere against harassment, assault, kidnapping, acid
throwing, and murder over dowry disputes.
Amnesty International reported that in 2010 police had
received more than 3,500 complaints of physical abuse of women over dowry
disputes, and in 2011, violence against women topped all crimes reported to the
police between January and June, and 1586 out of 7,285 complaints were of rape
cases. Due
to prevalent patriarchal social attitudes, women in general, but especially from
low socioeconomic backgrounds, lack access to resources for protection or legal
redress. Domestic violence, however, transcends class barriers and
acid-throwing is a brutal favoured punishment of spurned suitors or disgruntled
husbands. There is also extensive trafficking of women to other countries in
Asia and Middle East, lured by job prospects but forced into prostitution.
Moreover, The Daily Star quoted United
Nations World Food Program (UNWFP) on International Women’s Day 2012 asserting that much effort was still needed to improve the lives of women in
Bangladesh. The report said that almost half of the female population in Bangladesh is married before reaching 16, which results
in higher pregnancy rate in adolescence, and undernourished mothers then give
birth to underweight babies. Many young girls are still denied schooling and
face bleak futures. UN Secretary General Mr. Ban Ki-moon urged the government,
civil society and the private sector to work for gender equality in Bangladesh,
which had not kept pace with strides in economic development.
Clearly, Bangladesh’s economic gains are not
fully transferred to its women though their contribution to the economy is
substantial, especially to the garment industry which is the source of 90% of
Bangladesh’s foreign exchange. Institutions like Grameen Bank and BRAC have revolutionized the lives of many rural women by extending micro-credit to
them, and have contributed to their economic empowerment, but unfortunately,
Grameen Bank founder, the Nobel Laureate Muhammad Yunus, has been attacked by
Sheikh Hasina, ironically again, in what is seen as a political move.
Gender bias has also often surfaced through
religious expression. In April 2011, CNN reported that when the government announced its Women Development Policy 2011 about
inheritance of property, protests broke out from the radical Islamic parties
that considered it a violation of the Quran’s injunctions about inheritance.
Ironically, the opposition party BNP of Kahleda Zia was reported to be
supporting the protest, undermining the cause of women’s empowerment just to
gain some political mileage.
In July 2011,
Human Rights Watch reiterated its concern for Bangladeshi women who
are increasingly on the receiving end of religious fatwas issued by so-called scholars, even against the rulings of civil
courts, in shalishes, the traditional
dispute resolution methods. These decrees have resulted in humiliating
punishments resulting in death for young girls wrongly accused. The punishments
include imposing fines, lashing, cutting hair or blackening faces, and
ostracizing families, carried out by vigilantes. While many of these
incidents go unreported, human rights groups claim at least 300 such incidents have
occurred in the last decade. In 2011, one particular case in Shariatpur
district highlighted the seriousness of the issue when the shalish ordered 100
lashes to Hena Akhter for an alleged affair, when she had reportedly been
sexually abused. She collapsed while the punishment was being carried out, and
later died. Thus, the government’s failure to effectively address such
incidences and implement legislation continues to result in grievous harm to women
under the watch of their woman Prime Minister.
It should
be a matter of pride for Bangladesh that in November 2010 it was elected to the
board of UN Women, but to do justice to this role Bangladesh’s Begums need to
shift focus from personal and political gains and use their position to aggressively
to work towards emancipation and empowerment of the average woman. Only then
can the Bangladeshi women be truly proud of their Begums.
A version of this article was published in SouthAsia, April 2012, as Changing Priorities
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for sharing your views.